Attorney profile
Trademarkia
The short version
Trademarkia is a Mountain View intellectual property platform handling trademark, patent, and copyright filings plus business formation, rated 3.70 across 167 reviews.
Strengths
- Broad intellectual property and business services under one roof, spanning trademarks, patents, copyrights, incorporation, and domains.
- Reviewers frequently credit named attorneys and case managers for responsiveness and for making a technical process navigable.
- Handles international applicants seeking US trademark protection, including clients filing from overseas.
- Self-service research tools include a free trademark search, copyright owner lookups, and published IP guides.
- Multiple satisfied customers describe the pricing as fair value for the work received.
Considerations
- Recurring reports of additional charges beyond the initial quote, including monitoring fees on marks still in process.
- Several reviewers describe unanswered emails and calls, with matters stalled for extended periods.
- Billing and refund disputes appear in a notable share of lower-rated reviews.
About Trademarkia
Trademarkia is an intellectual property services company in Mountain View, California, built around high-volume online filing rather than a traditional boutique law practice. Its catalog covers trademark registration, free and comprehensive searches, international filings, office action responses, oppositions, litigation, renewals, revivals, statements of use, brand monitoring, and cease-and-desist letters. The platform extends well past trademarks: provisional, design, and utility patent applications, PCT international patents, copyright registration and copyright record searches, business formation for LLCs, C corporations, S corporations, and nonprofits, beneficial ownership reporting, legal forms, domain search and domain disputes, plus Amazon seller and immigration services.
The customer base skews toward small businesses, startups, solo entrepreneurs, and overseas applicants filing in the United States. Reviewers frequently describe being walked through an unfamiliar process by a named case manager or attorney, and several mention succeeding on marks that had stalled when filed independently. Scheduled calls, video instructions, and stage-by-stage updates are the communication methods that come up most. Marketing on the site positions the company as a top-volume USPTO filer and emphasizes post-filing protection alongside initial registration.
What customers praise repeatedly: the breadth of services available from one provider, professional and knowledgeable staff, clear explanations of filing options, and pricing several clients call fair for the work delivered. Attorneys and case managers are singled out by name often enough that individual service quality appears to shape the overall experience. Self-service tools, including a free trademark search, copyright owner lookups, and a guides library, let visitors research before engaging paid services.
The limitations are equally consistent. Multiple reviewers report charges beyond the initial quote, including monitoring fees, and describe difficulty reaching anyone by phone or email when a matter stalls. Others note applications sitting for many months or more than a year without visible movement. Trademarkia has responded publicly to a number of these accounts, attributing delays and added requirements to USPTO examiner requests and outstanding client confirmations rather than to filing errors. The company’s 3.70 rating across 167 reviews reflects that spread: smooth registrations on one side, billing and communication disputes on the other. The office is located at 1580 W El Camino Real in Mountain View, with phone inquiries accepted at 877-794-9511.
Recurring feedback
What clients consistently mention
- Satisfaction is often tied to a specific staff member, with clients crediting named attorneys and case managers for clear guidance and follow-through.
- Cost predictability is the most frequent complaint, centered on charges arising after the initial quote, particularly around office actions and intent-to-use requirements.
- Response times divide reviewers: some report updates at each filing stage, while others describe messages and calls that went unanswered.
- Timelines vary widely, from registrations that complete without friction to applications reportedly suspended or delayed for a year or more.
- Overall outcomes land at both extremes, with results appearing to depend on mark complexity and examiner-driven requirements.
All reviews
3.7 out of five stars based on 167 reviews.
Login to see all reviews