The Webb Law Firm

About The Webb Law Firm

The Webb Law Firm is an intellectual property law firm headquartered at One Gateway Center in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Operating since 1845, it describes itself as the oldest continuously operating IP boutique in the United States, serving clients locally and internationally from its Pittsburgh office. Its practice spans patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, licensing and business strategies, and litigation and enforcement. Trademark offerings include copyright and trademark work, international and worldwide trademark services, trademark counseling, infringement, protection, and trial representation.

With more than 50 attorneys and patent agents and over 150 total employees, the firm brings substantial depth across technical fields such as chemical engineering, computer science and software, biotechnology, medical technology and biology, mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, plants and agriculture, and artificial intelligence. That range is positioned to support clients seeking to secure, enforce, and defend intellectual property rights. The firm also emphasizes collaboration and tailored solutions, noting that its professionals have experience in industry, other law firms, in-house roles, and government.

Customers who leave written feedback tend to highlight clear communication, practical guidance, and a calm, pressure-free approach to trademark matters. One reviewer described receiving a straightforward outline of next steps during a stressful situation, while others offered brief positive comments about the firm as a law office and source of legal advice. The overall public rating stands at 4.60 from nine reviews, indicating generally favorable sentiment among those who have shared feedback.

The review record is not extensive. Several of the nine ratings lack written comments, so prospective clients may find limited narrative detail when researching the firm. One negative review raises an unspecified concern about the character of business partners, which contrasts with the predominantly positive ratings while other clients praise clear trademark guidance. Pricing and consultation details are also not included in the firm’s website, so cost expectations may require direct inquiry.

One negative reviewer raises a concern about business partners without describing the matter in detail. Other clients describe direct trademark explanations and a calm, low-pressure experience rather than recurring complaints about communication.

One trademark client describes receiving a clear plan during a stressful situation and appreciates the absence of pressure to proceed.