The Lomnitzer Law Firm, P.A.

About The Lomnitzer Law Firm, P.A.

The Lomnitzer Law Firm, P.A. is an intellectual property, entertainment, and business litigation practice headquartered at 7999 N Federal Hwy in Boca Raton, Florida, serving clients nationwide. The firm’s core work involves securing and monetizing creative and commercial assets: trademark and copyright registration, patent applications and prosecution, IP litigation, infringement and counterfeit goods claims, cease-and-desist demands, trade secrets, and right-of-publicity matters. Its attorneys also handle proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, including oppositions and cancellations, along with post-grant proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

Beyond core IP, the practice covers entertainment and sports law across film, music, sports, theater, and creator platforms, plus NIL contracts, brand ambassador and influencer agreements, social media law, data breach response, and online defamation. A corporate side addresses business formation and startup needs, regulatory compliance, commercial and civil litigation, and outside general counsel engagements. That range suits the clientele the firm describes: business owners, inventors, entrepreneurs, artists, and influencers who need both transactional filings and courtroom advocacy.

Reviewers most often single out responsiveness and communication. Clients describe quick replies to calls and emails, proactive follow-up when messages slip through, and clear explanations of trademark, patent, and copyright concepts for founders who are new to IP. Individual attorneys - Lorri Lomnitzer, Viktor Lyusi, and Kelly Ann desRosiers - are frequently named for knowledge, preparation, and guidance through disputes and mediation. Several reviewers mention cost-conscious handling, including return of unused retainer funds. The firm advertises 18 years of representation and notes Super Lawyers recognition.

The review profile is not uniformly positive. A minority of reviewers report billing disagreements, including itemized charges they considered excessive, being billed for update-related correspondence, and questions about security deposit refunds. Others describe delayed or inconsistent communication and matters that remained unresolved. Notably, the firm has publicly disputed several negative reviews, asserting they come from a defendant it sued rather than from actual clients - a recurring pattern that readers should weigh when interpreting the overall rating. For clients seeking aggressive IP and entertainment representation with a broad service menu, the firm’s depth is the main draw; prospective clients should confirm fee structures and communication expectations up front.