The Law Office of Vincent Miletti, Esq.

About The Law Office of Vincent Miletti, Esq.

Based at 2139 E 3rd St in Brooklyn, The Law Office of Vincent Miletti, Esq. is an employment and business law practice serving clients in New York and New Jersey. The firm reports more than 15 years of combined service, beginning with business and brand representation and expanding since 2012 to include worker-protection matters. Two contact lines are listed, one for New Jersey and one for New York, and prospective clients can request a free initial strategy session.

The practice spans two broad audiences. For employers and business owners, it covers government regulation compliance, administrative law, and intellectual property work including copyright, patent, and trademark, alongside general commercial matters. For employees, the focus is discrimination law broken out by protected category - age, pregnancy, race, disability, gender, and religion - plus harassment and sexual harassment, employee rights, FMLA, labor disputes, wage and hour, unpaid overtime, workplace retaliation, wrongful termination, and whistleblower claims. Personal injury representation is also listed, covering construction accidents, product liability, and slip and fall. Vincent Miletti heads the firm alongside a named team that includes Ron A. Kort, Melody Cabuslay, Anna Smirnova, Rina Acuyong, and Isaac Thuku. The firm publishes a blog, social media, and video resources.

Review feedback is overwhelmingly positive across 39 ratings, producing a 4.9 average. The most consistent theme is communication: clients describe the attorney walking them through each stage of a matter, returning questions quickly - including one account of a late-night message answered early the following morning - and making himself directly reachable. Reviewers also cite thoroughness in document review, contract analysis, and trademark filings, and describe work on matters ranging from LLC formation and tenant-landlord disputes to insurance conflicts and labor concerns. Several note the free consultation and describe the firm’s pricing as reasonable relative to the service.

The review profile is not without friction. One critical rating disputes the attorney’s courtroom conduct, and the firm publicly responded that it did not recognize the reviewer as a client. Most other reviews are brief and general rather than detailed about timelines, fees, or case outcomes, so prospective clients should expect to confirm scope and cost directly. Because the firm operates across two states with separate phone lines, clients should also verify which office and attorney will handle their matter.