Omni Legal Group

About Omni Legal Group

Omni Legal Group is an intellectual property and business law practice represented here by its Los Angeles office. Its website lists trademark filing, registration, transfers, searches, international applications and trademark litigation. Related offerings include utility and design patents, patent litigation, copyright, cyber law, trade secrets, mediation and business formation. The firm also advertises consulting and broader business dispute support. Its office information includes Los Angeles, Beverly Hills and Santa Monica, and the site provides consultation options, videos and publications about intellectual property. The trademark menu extends from initial brand protection to managing existing rights and disputes. The practice website gives 855-433-2226 as a contact number, while the saved Los Angeles Google profile lists 310-860-2000. The directory entry represents the Google location at Century Park East and the firm’s shared website.

Listed services include Trademark Applications, Trademark Litigation, Federal Trademark Application, International Trademark Application, Patents Trademarks.

Reviews repeatedly identify Omid Khalifeh and his team and praise clear communication, organized work and prompt support. Several discuss trademark applications, copyright matters or repeat engagements over a number of years. One reviewer describes a response to a likelihood-of-confusion refusal that led to acceptance for publication; that stage should not be confused with a final registration. Others praise practical explanations and assistance with urgent questions. The outcomes described apply to those clients’ individual circumstances.

The practice has a 5-star average across 188 ratings.

The office is at 2029 Century Pk E Ste 400, Los Angeles, CA 90067. Its listed telephone number is +1310-860-2000. The practice website is www.omnilegalgroup.com.

Omni clients praise organized work and clear explanations rather than recurring communication problems. Written trademark and copyright accounts describe reliable assistance and repeat engagements, without repeated billing or follow-through complaints.

One client describes seeking help with a Section 2(d) trademark refusal. The reviewer praises Omid for candidly explaining the difficulty before taking the matter and credits the team’s effort with overcoming the refusal. Another client describes about four years of ongoing trademark and copyright assistance.

The Section 2(d) client also appreciates that Omid explained the uncertainty candidly rather than promising an outcome before addressing the refusal.