Attorney profile
Massey Bean & Lewis
The short version
Massey Bean & Lewis is a downtown Salt Lake City law firm handling corporate and venture matters, intellectual property including trademark applications, and litigation for founders, management teams, and investors.
Strengths
- Combines corporate and venture, intellectual property (patent, trademark, copyright), and litigation practices under one roof.
- Founded by attorneys with prior experience at large national firms and offers outside general counsel services.
- Reviewers repeatedly praise prompt, precise, and educational communication from attorneys.
- Merger and acquisition work and trademark representation are the most frequently cited areas of positive feedback.
- Downtown Salt Lake City office at 50 W Broadway, convenient for business clients in the central business district.
Considerations
- Some reviewers report emails and follow-up messages going unanswered, including a referral who received no response from either the handling attorney or the main firm address.
- At least one prospective client said the firm cited limited capacity after an initial intake exchange rather than declining upfront.
- Reviews reference several different firm names, and the firm has noted publicly that at least one review concerned a case type it does not handle.
About Massey Bean & Lewis
Massey Bean & Lewis is a Salt Lake City law firm located at 50 W Broadway, on the tenth floor of a downtown office building, practicing across corporate and venture law, intellectual property, and litigation and disputes. The firm describes itself as founded by attorneys who previously worked at some of the largest firms in the country and chose a different model - one organized around practical counsel, genuine partnership, and measurable outcomes rather than legal activity alone.
On the corporate side, MBL advises founders, management teams, and investors through formation, early fundraising, growth, M&A, and exit, with stated experience in venture capital, private equity, debt financing, securities compliance, and strategic transactions. The intellectual property practice covers patents, trademarks, and copyrights; trademark applications are a listed service, and the firm states it has helped clients secure and defend IP for leading brands. A litigation team handles disputes and courtroom advocacy. Several of the firm’s attorneys also serve as outside general counsel, acting as embedded advisors who anticipate problems rather than simply documenting decisions already made.
Reviewer feedback is strongest on the transactional and intellectual property side. Multiple reviewers describe prompt, precise, and educational communication, with attorneys explaining what to expect and why. Merger and acquisition work is singled out repeatedly, as is trademark representation - one reviewer recounted being told a mark would be difficult to secure and ultimately obtaining it. Reviewers also mention professionalism and a sense of partnership during ongoing business relationships.
The firm holds a 4.40 rating across roughly 15 reviews, and the record is not uniformly positive. Two reviewers report unanswered emails and follow-ups, including one referral who tried both an individual attorney and the main firm address without a response. Another prospective client said the firm declined after an initial intake exchange, citing limited capacity. A separate review concerns a case type the firm publicly stated it does not handle, and several reviews reference the firm under other names, indicating some confusion about which practice the reviewer actually contacted.
Overall, MBL presents as a mid-sized, business-focused firm for companies and IP owners seeking plain-spoken advice and litigation capability, with responsiveness the main area where feedback diverges.
Recurring feedback
What clients consistently mention
- Professionalism and clarity: recurring praise for attorneys who communicate promptly, precisely, and in educational terms so clients understand what to expect.
- Transactional strength: business transactions and merger-and-acquisition matters appear repeatedly among the strongest reviews.
- Trademark outcomes: reviewers highlight trademark representation, including a matter described as difficult that ended in a successful registration.
- Firm identification confusion: several reviews name other firms, and at least one owner response indicates a reviewer contacted the wrong practice.
All reviews
4.4 out of five stars based on 15 reviews.
Login to see all reviews