Attorney profile
Howard M. Cohn and Associates
The short version
Howard M. Cohn and Associates is a Cleveland-based intellectual property law firm serving inventors, startups, businesses, and artists with patents, trademarks, copyrights, and related IP counsel.
Strengths
- Comprehensive IP practice covering patents, trademarks, copyrights, international trademarks, searches, enforcement, and maintenance.
- Frequently praised for responsive communication, fast turnaround, and timely updates on USPTO matters.
- Seen as honest and direct, including advising clients when a patent or trademark may not be worth pursuing.
- Accommodating for startups, first-time filers, artists, and businesses seeking practical IP guidance.
- Competitive or reasonable fees noted in reviews, with online payment and free initial advice available through the website.
Considerations
- A small number of reviews describe rude or abrasive phone or consultation interactions.
- One review reports a patent rejected on all 12 points and expresses dissatisfaction with the cost.
- Initial consultation experiences appear inconsistent, even though most feedback is positive.
About Howard M. Cohn and Associates
Howard M. Cohn and Associates is an intellectual property law firm located on Chagrin Boulevard in Cleveland, Ohio. The practice centers on patents, trademarks, copyrights, and broader IP protection, with services spanning patent searches, provisional patents, utility patents, design patents, plant patents, PCT international applications, trademark searches, trademark applications, trademark enforcement, trademark maintenance, international trademarks, and copyright law. The firm presents itself as a tenured office with more than 30 years of service, and its website organizes client resources into practice-area guides, articles, video series, FAQs, a glossary, form downloads, a blog, and an IP video library. Visitors can request appointments, seek free expert advice, pay fees online, and access a Chinese introduction page. The firm also lists government contracts and national offices among its resources.
The Cleveland office serves a mix of individual inventors, startups, established businesses, artists, and companies protecting proprietary technology and brand assets. Review patterns show particular appreciation for responsiveness, speed, and clear communication. Many reviewers describe the trademark and patent process as easier to navigate because attorneys and staff explain steps, risks, and options. Daniel and Howard are mentioned by name across numerous reviews, with comments highlighting directness, professionalism, and practical guidance. Several reviewers note that the firm is willing to tell clients when a matter may not be worth pursuing, which supports its reputation for honest counsel rather than simply filing every application. Startups and first-time filers appear frequently in feedback, as do long-term business clients using the firm for trademark maintenance and ongoing IP needs.
One reviewer compares pricing favorably with another attorney, and another mentions competitive prices for first-time patent filing. The firm’s website further supports convenience through appointment booking, online payment, free initial advice, and a substantial self-service resource library.
Limitations are visible in a small number of negative reviews. A few describe rude or abrasive phone or consultation interactions, and one reports a patent rejected on all 12 points along with dissatisfaction about the cost. These complaints are outliers against a largely positive set of 45 reviews and a 4.7 rating, but they indicate that client experience can vary, especially during initial contact or when outcomes are unfavorable.
Recurring feedback
What clients consistently mention
- Responsiveness and communication: recurring feedback highlights prompt replies, accessibility, and clear explanations throughout patent and trademark matters.
- Efficiency and turnaround: reviewers often mention fast filings, urgent submissions, and deadlines being met.
- Honesty and practical guidance: clients frequently value straightforward assessments, including advice not to pursue certain applications.
- Support for first-time filers and startups: many reviews describe patient guidance for individuals and newer businesses navigating IP processes.
- Cost and value: several reviews note reasonable, competitive, or favorable pricing relative to other legal providers.
All reviews
4.7 out of five stars based on 45 reviews.
Login to see all reviews