Goodman Law Center

About Goodman Law Center

Goodman Law Center is a Reno, Nevada law practice focused on intellectual property and the legal needs that surround it. The firm’s practice areas cover trademark law, copyright law, patent law, and business law, with trademark services spanning applications, trademark attorney representation, trademark protection, and general trademark law counsel. Attorney Mark Goodman founded the practice around a straightforward audience: inventors and entrepreneurs who need to protect their ideas. He earned a bachelor’s degree from UC Berkeley in 2001 and a law degree from the University of San Francisco in 2005, and is licensed in Nevada and California as well as to practice nationally in proceedings before the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

The firm’s stated experience includes acquiring U.S. federal trademark registrations for many clients, drafting and prosecuting U.S. patent applications that have issued as patents, advising on copyright matters, and handling business law work such as forming a Nevada non-profit corporation and completing its tax-exempt application. Clients reach the office at 10775 Double R Blvd #103 in south Reno, by phone at 775-473-4268, or through the firm’s website, which offers online appointment booking, payment, intake forms, and separate patent and trademark application forms. The site also hosts a blog, podcast, and video content aimed at educating inventors and business owners.

Across 72 Google reviews carrying a 4.90 average, the pattern is consistent: clients describe Goodman as knowledgeable, approachable, and quick to respond. Reviewers repeatedly mention being walked through the trademark or patent process step by step, having complex legal concepts explained in plain language, and receiving advice that addressed business concerns beyond the immediate filing. Several accounts describe successful outcomes, including multiple registered trademarks and patents brought to issuance, and a number of reviewers report long-running relationships with the firm spanning five or six years. Contract review, intellectual property disputes, probate, estate planning, and real estate matters also appear in feedback, indicating the practice is not limited to filings.

Reviewers describe prompt replies, accessibility by phone, and explanations delivered in accessible terms. Cost is another recurring subject, with multiple clients characterizing fees as reasonable and noting that pricing and scheduling were laid out upfront. Team members, including staff named in reviews, are frequently credited alongside Goodman for their role in the experience.

Limitations are worth noting. Feedback also clusters around patent, trademark, and business matters, with less volume describing the firm’s estate planning and probate work. Prospective clients with questions about fees, timelines, or contested filings will likely need to confirm specifics directly with the office.