CarnesWarwick - Raleigh

About CarnesWarwick - Raleigh

CarnesWarwick - Raleigh is a law firm listed at 555 Fayetteville St #300 in Raleigh, North Carolina, with a phone number that matches the contact information on the firm’s website. The firm’s practice spans business law, intellectual property, litigation, and liability and risk. Its website describes work with engineers, inventors, gaming startups, and entrepreneurs on developing, licensing, selling, and maintaining ownership of their creations. The intellectual property practice covers searches, applications, and filings for trademarks, copyrights, and patents, as well as enforcement, licensing, and settlement agreements when infringement arises. Business law services include entity development, contracts for licensing, distribution, sponsorship, and merchandising, plus purchasing and partnership agreements and merger and acquisition matters. Litigation support is presented as available for disputes ranging from thousands to millions of dollars in claimed damages, and the liability and risk practice assesses operational structure, digital or physical space, products, consumers, and entity type to tailor risk plans, permit applications, and insurance policies.

The firm appears best suited to businesses and creators that need both transactional guidance and courtroom experience, particularly in technology, software, gaming, and intellectual property contexts. Reviewers have praised the firm for professionalism, responsiveness, and the ability to understand complex technical subjects. One reviewer described a copyright infringement matter involving software and noted that attorneys including Tara and Jonathan asked the right questions and managed international scheduling well. Other positive reviews highlight capable representation, clear communication, and a strong recommendation for anyone seeking legal representation. The firm’s website footer lists a Durham mailing address, while the directory listing places the office in Raleigh, so clients may want to confirm appointment logistics and preferred contact methods in advance.

The overall picture is a small, relationship-oriented practice with deep intellectual property and business law offerings. Repeated positive feedback centers on professionalism and technical comprehension, but negative reviews introduce meaningful caution around follow-through. One reviewer reported missed filing paperwork for five months and a lack of response to calls, emails, and text messages after an initially supportive engagement. Another described a property theft civil case in which communication stopped for months, then years, before a demand letter was sent. These accounts contrast with the firm’s positive reviews and suggest that prospective clients should establish clear timelines, filing responsibilities, and communication expectations from the start.